Thomas Friedman, ever the technological optimist, heralds the coming revolution in online education.
There is a kind of Hegelian strain in Friedman’s boosterism for neo-liberalism and globalization; not the state, but the free market is the march of spirit on Earth. Any nasty consequences are just the acceptable side-effects and bugs of the beta version of something that will be surely perfected in the next iteration or soft-ware update. Though Friedman’s natural optimism sometimes gets the better of him, his point about the potential impact of online learning in so-called developing countries is hard to deny. This, coupled with increasing access to nimble tools like micro-finance, may well give people in the poorer countries and forgotten places of the world more opportunity to improve their lives.
We often discuss the merits and demerits of online education in the context of life in the developed world. While this is surely an important discussion to be having, it may blind us to the prospect that the most far reaching, world-historical effect of online education may be felt not by us, but by those still struggling to secure basic needs.
My friend and colleague Dan Fincke just posted a reflection on his own journey through the twisted funhouse of the academic employment market. Dan’s energy and passion–as a teacher and a blogger–has for years simply dumbfounded those of us who know him; his efforts are über-human, and in this way he is true to the ideal of his favorite philosopher, Nietzsche.
Dan’s situation is a symbol for what is wrong with professional philosophy. In much the same way that Andrew Sullivan–one of Dan’s role models as a blogger–has led the charge in upsetting the conventions and exposing the limitations of traditional print journalism, Dan is leveraging the new medium of the blog to do philosophy in way that is accessible, interesting, relevant, and important for a broader audience. I don’t say “popular” audience because that carries the whiff of “pop culture,” which spells “dumb.” But today’s popular audience, in some parts of the country and the world, at least, no longer spells dumb. When academics turn their nose up at “popular” writing and venues, I think they have this 19th century vision of a semi-literate hoi polloi a world removed from the elite bastions of oak-adorned studies and sophisticated salons. But Dan, like an increasing number of younger academics, smells the rot and decadence that infects this way of thinking and this way of doing philosophy. Again, like his intellectual hero, Nietzsche, Dan is finding a way to do philosophy outside the confines of academic scholarship. And it should concern us that the 20th century was the first in which almost all the major philosophers were academics. I heard a talk recently where a scholar argued that philosophy has always done better as a parasite (gadfly?)–when it uses something else as fodder for reflection, be it new developments in science, culture, technology, or politics. Whenever it tries, or pretends, to become it’s own thing, it retreats into a sorry sort of solipsistic solitude, a cloud of self-important knowingness; a retreat fueled by fear and insecurity. Voltaire’s Candide is precisely a mockery of this tendency–Dr. Pangloss (literally, “all words”) is the caricature of this mindset.
Continue reading “What Courage Looks Like”
Not to be confused with the “Law of Attraction,” the concept peddled by the best-selling self-help New Age book and film, The Secret: the idea that, if you just want something hard enough—“I think I can, I think I can”–it will eventually come into your life. Taken at a literal level, of course, this is plainly stupid and easy to mock. But the book wouldn’t be so successful if it didn’t contain a kernel of truth. The message resonates with people because it taps into a brute and basic psychological truth: that people who are generally open and optimistic will generally attract other people and opportunities that will generally get them what they want and where they want to go. It’s not a law of gravity, but a pragmatic strategy to help us navigate life.
One other such strategy is what we might call the Law of Subtraction. We can come at this concept by defining it in terms of what it’s not: the Law of Addition, which rules our lives more often than not. What is the Law of Addition?
Continue reading “The Law of Subtraction”
Please join us for our second MeetUp! RVSP
Our topic: “What is technology doing to our society?” Digital technology is rapidly and radically changing just about everything we do. As Emerson said, “things are in the saddle, and ride us.” Whether we see this spreading as a wildfire, a disease, or a wave of freedom–or as just really cool–I think we can all agree that its simply a fascinating phenomenon. How are different technologies–medical, transportation, communication, information–changing our lives, for better or worse?
Please come join us for a Sunday afternoon of collective inquiry!
If you’d like to learn more, check out my website at www.davidestorey.com
*If you plan to attend, please be sure to patronize our generous host, Sit and Wonder Café.
**If you would like to suggest discussion topics, please let me know.
***Space is limited. I am exploring an alternative venue that can accommodate more members of our growing group. Stay tuned!